Miercoles 21/07/10 Apple mas expectacular que nunca!!
Re: Miercoles 21/07/10 Apple mas expectacular que nunca!!
por admin » Mié Jul 21, 2010 8:59 am
VIX up 24.56
- admin
- Site Admin
- Mensajes: 164292
- Registrado: Mié Abr 21, 2010 9:02 pm
Re: Miercoles 21/07/10 Apple mas expectacular que nunca!!
por admin » Mié Jul 21, 2010 9:14 am
En azul +8.33
- admin
- Site Admin
- Mensajes: 164292
- Registrado: Mié Abr 21, 2010 9:02 pm
Re: Miercoles 21/07/10 Apple mas expectacular que nunca!!
por admin » Mié Jul 21, 2010 9:24 am
+17.03
- admin
- Site Admin
- Mensajes: 164292
- Registrado: Mié Abr 21, 2010 9:02 pm
Re: Miercoles 21/07/10 Apple mas expectacular que nunca!!
por admin » Mié Jul 21, 2010 9:32 am
Los inventariso de petroleo suben 360,000 barriles, este es la temporada cuando los inventarios deberian estar bajando., los de gasolina subieron 1.1 millones de barriles.
Oil down 77.38
Euro down 1.2823
+11.74
Oil down 77.38
Euro down 1.2823
+11.74
- admin
- Site Admin
- Mensajes: 164292
- Registrado: Mié Abr 21, 2010 9:02 pm
Re: Miercoles 21/07/10 Apple mas expectacular que nunca!!
por admin » Mié Jul 21, 2010 9:33 am
MG + 10%
- admin
- Site Admin
- Mensajes: 164292
- Registrado: Mié Abr 21, 2010 9:02 pm
Re: Miercoles 21/07/10 Apple mas expectacular que nunca!!
por admin » Mié Jul 21, 2010 9:40 am
La luna de miel termina, los independientes y los blancos abandonan a Obama despues de un anio.
La caida en el apoyo de esos grupos ha bajado en 30%
A Year After Honeymoon Ends, Whites, Men and Independents Desert Obama
By Peter Brown
Peter A. Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute, is a former White House correspondent with two decades of experience covering Washington government and politics. Click here for Mr. Brown’s full bio.
It was a year ago this month that President Barack Obama began losing voters. In the 12 months since, he has had legislative victories that appear – especially in the case of health care – to have cost him large amounts of both political capital and political support.
British Prime Minister David Cameron and President Barack Obama hold a joint news conference in the East Room of the White House Tuesday.(Photo by Oli Scarff/Getty Images) A comparison of the public’s views of him then and now tells us a great deal about the shape of American politics and how difficult it is for any president, even one as politically gifted as Barack Obama, to surmount the nation’s deep political and ideological divisions.
Mr. Obama won a surprisingly easy victory in 2008, carrying 53% of the popular vote and 365 electoral votes – along with Bill Clinton in 1996, the biggest Democratic presidential win since Lyndon Johnson’s 1964 landslide.
Candidate Obama promised “change we can believe in,” a post-partisan, problem-solving presidency that would heal the nation’s yawning political divide. By the time he was inaugurated in January 2009, Mr. Obama had stratospheric public approval ratings, heightened by many who had voted against him but decided to give him a chance despite their misgivings.
For the first six months of his presidency, Mr. Obama retained vigorous public support – until he tried to translate into legislation his promise to “reform” health care, which, it turned out, meant different things to different voters. In July 2009, the demonstrations against the Obama health care plan reached critical mass and began to deflate the president’s poll numbers, and that continues today.
Skepticism About the Government’s Role
The U.S. economy has continued to flounder, and surely that is part of the reason for the president’s decreased standing. But the disillusionment with the president’s handling of the economy stems from the same public skepticism about the role of government in economic policy as in health care.
Quinnipiac University today released a national poll of 2,181 registered voters, almost twice the size of most national polls. (It has a margin of error of 2.1 percentage points.) It showed President Obama’s net job approval rating at its lowest point ever – 44% approve, 48% disapprove.
In July 2009, Quinnipiac’s national poll had the president with 57% approve, 33% disapprove.
The decline in Mr. Obama’s support over the past year has been across the-board, with the largest decreases being among whites, older voters, political independents and men.
Some of it was to be expected. It was unlikely, for instance, that given Mr. Obama’s preference for increased government involvement that he was going to keep the 21% of Republicans who approved of his job performance in July 2009. That figure is now 12% – more than a third lower.
Losing Faith in Obama
So, too, went white, evangelical Christians, perhaps the largest GOP constituency group. In July 2009, 35% said they approved of Mr. Obama’s job performance. Today, that figure has been cut almost in half – to 19%.
If it was just among Republicans and their ideological allies that the president was losing support that would not represent a serious political threat.
What is most problematic for the president is the drop among whites, men and political independents. Those demographic groups gave him greater support in 2008 than they had most Democratic presidential candidates over the past few decades.
Simply put, when Democrats carry or are competitive among whites, independents and men, they win the White House.
When they don’t, they don’t.
Winning the White House
On Election Day 2008, much was made of the increased turnout that Mr. Obama inspired among young voters and African-Americans, and to be sure that fattened his margin. But he won the White House because, the exit polling showed, he got 49% of men, 43% of whites and 52% of independents. Each of these three groups individually makes up a larger share of the electorate than blacks and young people combined.
In July 2009, President Obama had actually grown that support so that he was getting a thumbs-up job approval from 54% of men, 51% of whites and 52% of independents.
But today, the numbers for those three groups show just how far he has fallen. He gets a positive job approval from just 37% of whites, 38% of independents and 39% of men – a roughly 30% drop in all three groups in his support.
And the bleeding has spread to his fellow Democrats on Capitol Hill. In July 2009, voters said by 42%-34% that they would back a Democrat for Congress; today, they said they prefer a Republican, 43%-38%. The drop-off among the various demographic groups is similar to that for the president.
All of which suggests the last year has convinced an awful lot of the folks who hadn’t voted Democratic for president in some time before supporting President Obama to rethink their politics with an eye toward returning to their political roots.
Write to Peter Brown at peter.brown@quinnipiac.edu.
La caida en el apoyo de esos grupos ha bajado en 30%
A Year After Honeymoon Ends, Whites, Men and Independents Desert Obama
By Peter Brown
Peter A. Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute, is a former White House correspondent with two decades of experience covering Washington government and politics. Click here for Mr. Brown’s full bio.
It was a year ago this month that President Barack Obama began losing voters. In the 12 months since, he has had legislative victories that appear – especially in the case of health care – to have cost him large amounts of both political capital and political support.
British Prime Minister David Cameron and President Barack Obama hold a joint news conference in the East Room of the White House Tuesday.(Photo by Oli Scarff/Getty Images) A comparison of the public’s views of him then and now tells us a great deal about the shape of American politics and how difficult it is for any president, even one as politically gifted as Barack Obama, to surmount the nation’s deep political and ideological divisions.
Mr. Obama won a surprisingly easy victory in 2008, carrying 53% of the popular vote and 365 electoral votes – along with Bill Clinton in 1996, the biggest Democratic presidential win since Lyndon Johnson’s 1964 landslide.
Candidate Obama promised “change we can believe in,” a post-partisan, problem-solving presidency that would heal the nation’s yawning political divide. By the time he was inaugurated in January 2009, Mr. Obama had stratospheric public approval ratings, heightened by many who had voted against him but decided to give him a chance despite their misgivings.
For the first six months of his presidency, Mr. Obama retained vigorous public support – until he tried to translate into legislation his promise to “reform” health care, which, it turned out, meant different things to different voters. In July 2009, the demonstrations against the Obama health care plan reached critical mass and began to deflate the president’s poll numbers, and that continues today.
Skepticism About the Government’s Role
The U.S. economy has continued to flounder, and surely that is part of the reason for the president’s decreased standing. But the disillusionment with the president’s handling of the economy stems from the same public skepticism about the role of government in economic policy as in health care.
Quinnipiac University today released a national poll of 2,181 registered voters, almost twice the size of most national polls. (It has a margin of error of 2.1 percentage points.) It showed President Obama’s net job approval rating at its lowest point ever – 44% approve, 48% disapprove.
In July 2009, Quinnipiac’s national poll had the president with 57% approve, 33% disapprove.
The decline in Mr. Obama’s support over the past year has been across the-board, with the largest decreases being among whites, older voters, political independents and men.
Some of it was to be expected. It was unlikely, for instance, that given Mr. Obama’s preference for increased government involvement that he was going to keep the 21% of Republicans who approved of his job performance in July 2009. That figure is now 12% – more than a third lower.
Losing Faith in Obama
So, too, went white, evangelical Christians, perhaps the largest GOP constituency group. In July 2009, 35% said they approved of Mr. Obama’s job performance. Today, that figure has been cut almost in half – to 19%.
If it was just among Republicans and their ideological allies that the president was losing support that would not represent a serious political threat.
What is most problematic for the president is the drop among whites, men and political independents. Those demographic groups gave him greater support in 2008 than they had most Democratic presidential candidates over the past few decades.
Simply put, when Democrats carry or are competitive among whites, independents and men, they win the White House.
When they don’t, they don’t.
Winning the White House
On Election Day 2008, much was made of the increased turnout that Mr. Obama inspired among young voters and African-Americans, and to be sure that fattened his margin. But he won the White House because, the exit polling showed, he got 49% of men, 43% of whites and 52% of independents. Each of these three groups individually makes up a larger share of the electorate than blacks and young people combined.
In July 2009, President Obama had actually grown that support so that he was getting a thumbs-up job approval from 54% of men, 51% of whites and 52% of independents.
But today, the numbers for those three groups show just how far he has fallen. He gets a positive job approval from just 37% of whites, 38% of independents and 39% of men – a roughly 30% drop in all three groups in his support.
And the bleeding has spread to his fellow Democrats on Capitol Hill. In July 2009, voters said by 42%-34% that they would back a Democrat for Congress; today, they said they prefer a Republican, 43%-38%. The drop-off among the various demographic groups is similar to that for the president.
All of which suggests the last year has convinced an awful lot of the folks who hadn’t voted Democratic for president in some time before supporting President Obama to rethink their politics with an eye toward returning to their political roots.
Write to Peter Brown at peter.brown@quinnipiac.edu.
- admin
- Site Admin
- Mensajes: 164292
- Registrado: Mié Abr 21, 2010 9:02 pm
Re: Miercoles 21/07/10 Apple mas expectacular que nunca!!
por admin » Mié Jul 21, 2010 9:41 am
Menos mal que la ceguera era temporal, ya los Americanos se dieron cuenta de que el camarada Obama es lo peor que le ha podido pasar a la economia del pais. Y a lo demas tambien. Terrible experiencia y esperemos que nunca se vuelva a repetir.
- admin
- Site Admin
- Mensajes: 164292
- Registrado: Mié Abr 21, 2010 9:02 pm
Re: Miercoles 21/07/10 Apple mas expectacular que nunca!!
por admin » Mié Jul 21, 2010 10:06 am
-6.35
Hoy Obama firma la regulacion financiera.
Hoy Obama firma la regulacion financiera.
- admin
- Site Admin
- Mensajes: 164292
- Registrado: Mié Abr 21, 2010 9:02 pm
Re: Miercoles 21/07/10 Apple mas expectacular que nunca!!
por admin » Mié Jul 21, 2010 10:18 am
Canada
INDEX VALUE CHANGE % CHANGE TIME
S&P/TSX COMPOSITE INDEX 11,567.86 -62.02 -0.53% 11:09
S&P/TSX EQUITY INDEX 12,005.92 -67.49 -0.56% 11:09
S&P/TSX 60 INDEX 676.95 -4.81 -0.71% 11:09
S&P/TSX VENTURE COMP IDX 1,366.61 3.41 0.25% 11:09
Mexico
INDEX VALUE CHANGE % CHANGE TIME
MEXICO IPC INDEX 32,233.05 208.78 0.65% 10:48
MEXICO INMEX INDEX 1,840.24 9.21 0.50% 10:48
MEXICO IMC30 INDEX 443.90 1.04 0.23% 10:48
MSE TOTAL RETURN INDEX 37,794.59 244.80 0.65% 10:48
Argentina
INDEX VALUE CHANGE % CHANGE TIME
ARGENTINA MERVAL INDEX 2,350.58 14.16 0.61% 10:48
ARGENTINA BURCAP INDEX 8,416.40 36.77 0.44% 10:48
M.AR MERVAL ARGENTINA IX 1,797.58 19.49 1.10% 10:48
INDICE BOLSA GENERAL 132,606.98 294.20 0.22% 10:48
Brazil
INDEX VALUE CHANGE % CHANGE TIME
BRAZIL BOVESPA INDEX 64,434.46 -28.04 -0.04% 11:08
BRAZIL IBrX INDEX 20,347.88 72.79 0.36% 10:53
BRAZIL ELECTRIC.ENRGY IX 23,846.22 -34.41 -0.14% 10:53
BRAZIL TELECOM INDEX 1,384.28 -4.25 -0.31% 10:53
BRAZIL CORP GOV INDEX 6,740.73 27.01 0.40% 10:53
BRAZIL VAL/BOV 2 TIER IX 5,542.58 2.01 0.04% 10:53
BRAZIL IBrX-50 INDEX 8,894.85 32.72 0.37% 10:53
Chile
INDEX VALUE CHANGE % CHANGE TIME
CHILE STOCK MKT SELECT 4,266.92 25.17 0.59% 11:08
CHILE STOCK MKT GENERAL 19,765.55 108.55 0.55% 11:08
CHILE INTER-10 INDEX 5,071.50 13.42 0.27% 11:08
Venezuela
INDEX VALUE CHANGE % CHANGE TIME
VENEZUELA STOCK MKT INDX 64,250.07 0.00 0.00% 09:32
Peru
INDEX VALUE CHANGE % CHANGE TIME
PERU LIMA GENERAL INDEX 13,894.15 58.39 0.42% 10:53
PERU LIMA SELECTIVE INDX 20,751.44 79.58 0.38% 10:53
PERU 15 SELECTIVE INDEX 24,461.22 93.82 0.39% 10:53
Colombia
INDEX VALUE CHANGE % CHANGE TIME
S&P/TSX COMPOSITE INDEX 11,567.86 -62.02 -0.53% 11:09
S&P/TSX EQUITY INDEX 12,005.92 -67.49 -0.56% 11:09
S&P/TSX 60 INDEX 676.95 -4.81 -0.71% 11:09
S&P/TSX VENTURE COMP IDX 1,366.61 3.41 0.25% 11:09
Mexico
INDEX VALUE CHANGE % CHANGE TIME
MEXICO IPC INDEX 32,233.05 208.78 0.65% 10:48
MEXICO INMEX INDEX 1,840.24 9.21 0.50% 10:48
MEXICO IMC30 INDEX 443.90 1.04 0.23% 10:48
MSE TOTAL RETURN INDEX 37,794.59 244.80 0.65% 10:48
Argentina
INDEX VALUE CHANGE % CHANGE TIME
ARGENTINA MERVAL INDEX 2,350.58 14.16 0.61% 10:48
ARGENTINA BURCAP INDEX 8,416.40 36.77 0.44% 10:48
M.AR MERVAL ARGENTINA IX 1,797.58 19.49 1.10% 10:48
INDICE BOLSA GENERAL 132,606.98 294.20 0.22% 10:48
Brazil
INDEX VALUE CHANGE % CHANGE TIME
BRAZIL BOVESPA INDEX 64,434.46 -28.04 -0.04% 11:08
BRAZIL IBrX INDEX 20,347.88 72.79 0.36% 10:53
BRAZIL ELECTRIC.ENRGY IX 23,846.22 -34.41 -0.14% 10:53
BRAZIL TELECOM INDEX 1,384.28 -4.25 -0.31% 10:53
BRAZIL CORP GOV INDEX 6,740.73 27.01 0.40% 10:53
BRAZIL VAL/BOV 2 TIER IX 5,542.58 2.01 0.04% 10:53
BRAZIL IBrX-50 INDEX 8,894.85 32.72 0.37% 10:53
Chile
INDEX VALUE CHANGE % CHANGE TIME
CHILE STOCK MKT SELECT 4,266.92 25.17 0.59% 11:08
CHILE STOCK MKT GENERAL 19,765.55 108.55 0.55% 11:08
CHILE INTER-10 INDEX 5,071.50 13.42 0.27% 11:08
Venezuela
INDEX VALUE CHANGE % CHANGE TIME
VENEZUELA STOCK MKT INDX 64,250.07 0.00 0.00% 09:32
Peru
INDEX VALUE CHANGE % CHANGE TIME
PERU LIMA GENERAL INDEX 13,894.15 58.39 0.42% 10:53
PERU LIMA SELECTIVE INDX 20,751.44 79.58 0.38% 10:53
PERU 15 SELECTIVE INDEX 24,461.22 93.82 0.39% 10:53
Colombia
- admin
- Site Admin
- Mensajes: 164292
- Registrado: Mié Abr 21, 2010 9:02 pm
Re: Miercoles 21/07/10 Apple mas expectacular que nunca!!
por admin » Mié Jul 21, 2010 10:21 am
Copper July 21,11:18
Bid/Ask 3.0936 - 3.0981
Change +0.0810 +2.69%
Low/High 3.0012 - 3.1135
Charts
Nickel July 21,11:17
Bid/Ask 8.6931 - 8.7838
Change +0.0794 +0.92%
Low/High 8.6024 - 8.8405
Charts
Aluminum July 21,11:14
Bid/Ask 0.8859 - 0.8905
Change +0.0132 +1.51%
Low/High 0.8678 - 0.8955
Charts
Zinc July 21,11:18
Bid/Ask 0.8597 - 0.8642
Change +0.0222 +2.65%
Low/High 0.8329 - 0.8747
Charts
Lead July 21,11:18
Bid/Ask 0.8332 - 0.8377
Change +0.0157 +1.92%
Low/High 0.8147 - 0.8454
Bid/Ask 3.0936 - 3.0981
Change +0.0810 +2.69%
Low/High 3.0012 - 3.1135
Charts
Nickel July 21,11:17
Bid/Ask 8.6931 - 8.7838
Change +0.0794 +0.92%
Low/High 8.6024 - 8.8405
Charts
Aluminum July 21,11:14
Bid/Ask 0.8859 - 0.8905
Change +0.0132 +1.51%
Low/High 0.8678 - 0.8955
Charts
Zinc July 21,11:18
Bid/Ask 0.8597 - 0.8642
Change +0.0222 +2.65%
Low/High 0.8329 - 0.8747
Charts
Lead July 21,11:18
Bid/Ask 0.8332 - 0.8377
Change +0.0157 +1.92%
Low/High 0.8147 - 0.8454
- admin
- Site Admin
- Mensajes: 164292
- Registrado: Mié Abr 21, 2010 9:02 pm
Re: Miercoles 21/07/10 Apple mas expectacular que nunca!!
por admin » Mié Jul 21, 2010 10:24 am
Japón advirte sobre los efectos de una posible recesión en EE.UU. sobre su economía
Por Takashi Nakamichi
TOKIO (EFE Dow Jones)--El Gobierno de Japón expresó una gran preocupación sobre la repercusión de una posible recesión en Estados Unidos en su último informe publicado el miércoles, aunque mantiene en su mensaje ligeramente optimista sobre la situación actual de su economía.
El informe de julio señala que el Gobierno es más cauteloso respecto a los problemas del exterior y que están minando la recuperación de Japón, muy dependiente de las exportaciones. No obstante, dice que todavía se tiene que crear un sentido de urgencia para tomar cualquier medida de estímulo.
El informe apunta que "la atención debería dirigirse hacia los riesgos que la economía podría sufrir por una posible recesión de las economías extranjeras, especialmente de Estados Unidos y Europa". En el anterior informe no se hizo ninguna mención sobre Estados Unidos en estos términos.
La evolución de la economía estadounidense no está afectando de forma visible a Japón, pero "estamos atentos [a la economía de Estados Unidos] como factor de riesgo potencial para nuestra economía", dijo Keisuke Tsumura, secretario parlamentario del gabinete oficial responsable de la política económica y fiscal.
En particular, el Gobierno está preocupado por las señales de empeoramiento de la confianza entre los consumidores estadounidenses, cuyo gasto cuenta en más de dos tercios sobre la actividad económica del país, dijo.
Tsumura señaló que el reciente deterioro de algunos datos económicos japoneses sugieren "que existe la posibilidad de que la economía japonesa pueda haber entrado en un periodo de tregua", o en un estado en que apenas crece.
No obstante, no está claro en qué medida este pesimismo de Tsumura está extendido entre el resto del Ejecutivo. El informe de julio se mantiene en el ligero optimismo del anterior: "Aunque la economía ha estado repuntando a un ritmo constante, sigue en una situación difícil por la alta tasa de desempleo".
Por Takashi Nakamichi
TOKIO (EFE Dow Jones)--El Gobierno de Japón expresó una gran preocupación sobre la repercusión de una posible recesión en Estados Unidos en su último informe publicado el miércoles, aunque mantiene en su mensaje ligeramente optimista sobre la situación actual de su economía.
El informe de julio señala que el Gobierno es más cauteloso respecto a los problemas del exterior y que están minando la recuperación de Japón, muy dependiente de las exportaciones. No obstante, dice que todavía se tiene que crear un sentido de urgencia para tomar cualquier medida de estímulo.
El informe apunta que "la atención debería dirigirse hacia los riesgos que la economía podría sufrir por una posible recesión de las economías extranjeras, especialmente de Estados Unidos y Europa". En el anterior informe no se hizo ninguna mención sobre Estados Unidos en estos términos.
La evolución de la economía estadounidense no está afectando de forma visible a Japón, pero "estamos atentos [a la economía de Estados Unidos] como factor de riesgo potencial para nuestra economía", dijo Keisuke Tsumura, secretario parlamentario del gabinete oficial responsable de la política económica y fiscal.
En particular, el Gobierno está preocupado por las señales de empeoramiento de la confianza entre los consumidores estadounidenses, cuyo gasto cuenta en más de dos tercios sobre la actividad económica del país, dijo.
Tsumura señaló que el reciente deterioro de algunos datos económicos japoneses sugieren "que existe la posibilidad de que la economía japonesa pueda haber entrado en un periodo de tregua", o en un estado en que apenas crece.
No obstante, no está claro en qué medida este pesimismo de Tsumura está extendido entre el resto del Ejecutivo. El informe de julio se mantiene en el ligero optimismo del anterior: "Aunque la economía ha estado repuntando a un ritmo constante, sigue en una situación difícil por la alta tasa de desempleo".
- admin
- Site Admin
- Mensajes: 164292
- Registrado: Mié Abr 21, 2010 9:02 pm
Re: Miercoles 21/07/10 Apple mas expectacular que nunca!!
por admin » Mié Jul 21, 2010 10:25 am
Morgan Stanley registra ganancias por US$1.960 millones en el segundo trimestre
Por Nathan Becker
.La ganancia de Morgan Stanley repuntó durante el segundo trimestre del 2010 frente al mismo período del año pasado, cuando el resultado del banco fue afectado por la devolución al gobierno de fondos de rescate y por cargos contables asociados a fusiones.
Las acciones de Morgan Stanley subían el miércoles por la mañana el 2,7% a US$25,90 en las negociaciones electrónicas previas a la apertura de Wall Street, debido a que el resultado trimestral superó las expectativas de los analistas. Al cierre del martes, la acción había caído un 15% en lo que va del año.
En forma reciente, el desempeño de Morgan Stanley se había beneficiado de un incremento en los ingresos por negociación de valores de renta fija.
Morgan Stanley registró una ganancia de US$1.960 millones, o US$1,09 por acción, durante el trimestre, un aumento frente al beneficio de US$149 millones del mismo período del año pasado.
El trimestre de este año incluyó un beneficio después de impuestos de US$514 millones relacionado a la venta de su negocio minorista de administración de activos. Sobre una base de operaciones continuas, la ganancia fue de 80 centavos por acción.
La firma indicó el miércoles que los ingresos sumaron US$7.950 millones, un aumento del 53% frente a un año atrás, impulsados por el desempeño de la sociedad conjunta Morgan Stanley Smith Barney.
Según una encuesta de Thomson Reuters, los analistas esperaban, en promedio, que la firma anunciara una ganancia trimestral de 46 centavos por acción e ingresos de US$7.930 millones. En general, las estimaciones de los analistas excluyen las partidas extraordinarias
Los ingresos de la división de valores institucionales, que incluye los mercados de capital y la banca de inversión, crecieron el 52%. La ganancia de la división fue de US$1.570 millones.
Los ingresos del brazo global de administración de patrimonio ascendieron el 60%.
Por Nathan Becker
.La ganancia de Morgan Stanley repuntó durante el segundo trimestre del 2010 frente al mismo período del año pasado, cuando el resultado del banco fue afectado por la devolución al gobierno de fondos de rescate y por cargos contables asociados a fusiones.
Las acciones de Morgan Stanley subían el miércoles por la mañana el 2,7% a US$25,90 en las negociaciones electrónicas previas a la apertura de Wall Street, debido a que el resultado trimestral superó las expectativas de los analistas. Al cierre del martes, la acción había caído un 15% en lo que va del año.
En forma reciente, el desempeño de Morgan Stanley se había beneficiado de un incremento en los ingresos por negociación de valores de renta fija.
Morgan Stanley registró una ganancia de US$1.960 millones, o US$1,09 por acción, durante el trimestre, un aumento frente al beneficio de US$149 millones del mismo período del año pasado.
El trimestre de este año incluyó un beneficio después de impuestos de US$514 millones relacionado a la venta de su negocio minorista de administración de activos. Sobre una base de operaciones continuas, la ganancia fue de 80 centavos por acción.
La firma indicó el miércoles que los ingresos sumaron US$7.950 millones, un aumento del 53% frente a un año atrás, impulsados por el desempeño de la sociedad conjunta Morgan Stanley Smith Barney.
Según una encuesta de Thomson Reuters, los analistas esperaban, en promedio, que la firma anunciara una ganancia trimestral de 46 centavos por acción e ingresos de US$7.930 millones. En general, las estimaciones de los analistas excluyen las partidas extraordinarias
Los ingresos de la división de valores institucionales, que incluye los mercados de capital y la banca de inversión, crecieron el 52%. La ganancia de la división fue de US$1.570 millones.
Los ingresos del brazo global de administración de patrimonio ascendieron el 60%.
- admin
- Site Admin
- Mensajes: 164292
- Registrado: Mié Abr 21, 2010 9:02 pm
Re: Miercoles 21/07/10 Apple mas expectacular que nunca!!
por admin » Mié Jul 21, 2010 10:35 am
-24.67
Esperando a Bernanke para que el de direccion a este mercado.
Esperando a Bernanke para que el de direccion a este mercado.
- admin
- Site Admin
- Mensajes: 164292
- Registrado: Mié Abr 21, 2010 9:02 pm
Re: Miercoles 21/07/10 Apple mas expectacular que nunca!!
por admin » Mié Jul 21, 2010 11:00 am
-1.21
- admin
- Site Admin
- Mensajes: 164292
- Registrado: Mié Abr 21, 2010 9:02 pm
Re: Miercoles 21/07/10 Apple mas expectacular que nunca!!
por admin » Mié Jul 21, 2010 11:05 am
+1.82
- admin
- Site Admin
- Mensajes: 164292
- Registrado: Mié Abr 21, 2010 9:02 pm
¿Quién está conectado?
Usuarios navegando por este Foro: No hay usuarios registrados visitando el Foro y 12 invitados