LAST CHANGE % CHG
Get index data by Email
DJIA 18142.42 -18.77 -0.10%
Nasdaq 5189.13 -0.97 -0.02%
S&P 500 2126.15 -0.26 -0.01%
Russell 2000 1191.39 3.77 0.32%
Global Dow 2445.57 0.95 0.04%
Japan: Nikkei 225 17425.02 -21.39 -0.12%
Stoxx Europe 600 338.97 -1.83 -0.54%
UK: FTSE 100 6954.22 -42.04 -0.60%
DJIA
4:43 PM EDT 10/31/2016
1820018180181601814018120
10a11a12p1p2p3p
1D5D3M6M1Y3Y
Currencies5:12 PM EDT 10/31/2016
LAST(MID) CHANGE
Euro (EUR/USD) 1.0982 0.0001
Yen (USD/JPY) 104.83 0.00
Pound (GBP/USD) 1.2243 0.0001
Australia $ (AUD/USD) 0.7606 -0.0002
Swiss Franc (USD/CHF) 0.9889 -0.0003
WSJ Dollar Index 88.55 0.00
Futures4:59 PM EDT 10/31/2016
LAST CHANGE % CHG
Crude Oil 46.76 -1.94 -3.98%
Brent Crude 48.32 -1.39 -2.80%
Gold 1277.8 1.0 0.08%
Silver 17.900 0.104 0.58%
E-mini DJIA 18083 -15 -0.08%
E-mini S&P 500 2123.50 -0.25 -0.01%
Government Bonds4:55 PM EDT 10/31/2016
PRICE CHG YIELD
U.S. 10 Year 7/32 1.825
German 10 Year 1/32 0.165
Japan 10 Year 2/32 -0.051
Lunes 31/10/16 Semana del empleo
49 mensajes
• Página 4 de 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Re: Lunes 31/10/16 Semana del empleo
por admin » Lun Oct 31, 2016 4:13 pm
- admin
- Site Admin
- Mensajes: 164292
- Registrado: Mié Abr 21, 2010 9:02 pm
Re: Lunes 31/10/16 Semana del empleo
por admin » Lun Oct 31, 2016 7:52 pm
Asset Bubbles From Stocks to Bonds to Iron Ore Threaten China
Investment binge fueled by easy credit and fiscal stimulus increases volatility; prices surge, then slide
By John Lyons and Shen Hong Updated Oct. 31, 2016 8:43 p.m. ET
Workers in Shenzhen, China, move materials at a construction site in August. The city had the world’s largest increase in apartment prices last year, a sign of China’s housing bubble.
Workers in Shenzhen, China, move materials at a construction site in August. The city had the world’s largest increase in apartment prices last year, a sign of China’s housing bubble. Photo: Qilai Shen/Bloomberg News
A succession of asset bubbles has formed in China, caused by a torrent of speculative money sloshing from stocks to bonds to commodities.
The biggest apparent bubble is in housing, but prices have surged for niche assets, too, such as calligraphy, antiques and art. In May, futures prices for soybean meal, used as pig feed, jumped 40%. The trading volume of 600 million tons was nine times higher than China’s annual consumption. The pipe-making material PVC is up 40% so far this year on the Dalian Commodity Exchange.
The world’s second-largest economy is slowing. Easy credit and successive fiscal stimuli, designed to keep China aloft, mean it is awash in money that is chasing an increasingly small number of investment opportunities. China’s money supply has quadrupled since 2007, and the new cash is largely trapped inside the country by government capital controls.
“There are very few places left to invest in the real economy, so the money goes into the so-called virtual economy,” said Yang Delong, chief economist at First Seafront Fund Management Co., which manages $6 billion and is based in the manufacturing hub of Shenzhen. First Seafront has sharply cut its stockholdings in the past year and shifted toward bonds and commodities.
The zooming prices and frenetic trading are alarming to economists and Chinese leaders, who worry the volatility could mean China’s credit expansion has gone too far and is producing hazardous economic side effects.
“It’s impossible to know when you are in a bubble, but the succession of mini-bubbles is a pretty good sign historically that you are in a bubble,” said Michael Pettis, a finance professor at Peking University. “There would have to be an improbable number of economic coincidences coming together for all of these mini-bubbles not to be a sign of a bigger economic issue.”
In May, China’s official People’s Daily newspaper published a front-page interview with an unidentified “authoritative person” that was drafted by top economic advisers to President Xi Jinping. The interview cautioned that without proper management, excessive credit could provoke a systemic financial crisis, recession and the destruction of savings.
The risks have global significance. Iron-ore trading in China has sent prices around the world on a roller-coaster ride, and stock markets in Asia, Europe and the U.S. sank when Chinese stock markets crashed last year.
Iron-ore futures surged 50% earlier this year even though Chinese ports were piled with iron ore. Iron ore was unloaded in December from a cargo ship at the Port of Rizhao, in eastern China’s Shandong province.
Iron-ore futures surged 50% earlier this year even though Chinese ports were piled with iron ore. Iron ore was unloaded in December from a cargo ship at the Port of Rizhao, in eastern China’s Shandong province. Photo: Imaginechina/Associated Press
The risks are growing because speculative investments are owned by a vast cross-section of Chinese banks, companies and investment funds. Millions of consumers have sunk savings into new, high-return investment products. Some sellers of those products have already collapsed, sparking protests.
The powerful Politburo decision-making body said in July that asset bubbles are among the “risks and potential threats that deserve high attention,” according to state-run media. Analysts said it was the decision-making group’s first-ever reference to asset bubbles, likely triggered by property-price jumps in large Chinese cities.
Apartment prices in Shenzhen rose 47.5% last year, according to real-estate firm Knight Frank. That was the largest increase in the world and almost twice the 25% jump in the second-place city, Auckland, New Zealand.
To cool the housing market, some Chinese cities have increased down-payment requirements and limited some purchases. China’s leaders haven’t imposed new policies that damp the frenzy.
China’s total debt is expected to reach 260% of gross domestic product this year, up from 154% in 2008, according to analysts at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. That is one of the largest debt increases in modern history.
China’s debt-to-GDP ratio has widened from its long-term trendline about three times as much as the U.S. did before the 2008 financial crisis, according to the Bank for International Settlements, a consortium of central banks based in the Swiss city of Basel.
How China's Asset Bubbles Formed
Easy credit and a steady stream of financial stimulus have left China awash in money and deep in debt. Investors have poured cash into one asset type after another, increasing prices and volatility.
*traded on the Dalian Commodity Exchange
Sources: IMF via the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (money supply); Goldman Sachs (debt); China Index Academy/Soufun Real Estate Portal (property prices); Thomson Reuters (soymeal)
The debt binge began with a crisis-related stimulus package. China’s public and corporate debt then grew threefold to about $22 trillion as Communist Party leaders used freer credit to support struggling state-owned firms and meet annual economic-growth targets.
The downside of so much cash washing from one asset type to the next burst into view with a stock-market crash in the summer of 2015 that wiped out $5 trillion, or 43%, of value in Chinese stocks at one point. The Shanghai market had doubled from June 2014 to June 2015 as investors borrowed 2 trillion yuan ($300 billion) to buy stocks.
To steady the stock market, authorities restricted short selling, and a “national team” of investors relied on by the Chinese government to support its stock market stepped in to purchase beaten-up shares.
Money then flowed into bonds. Many investors bought them by borrowing money against bonds they already owned, repeating the process over and over again. Such borrowing grew to 2.5 times the size of the $7 trillion bond market, according to bond-market analysts.
The surge slowed only when yields tightened enough that bonds looked less attractive than other asset types.
In this year’s first quarter, China’s total credit surged by another $690 billion, equivalent to about three times the economy of Ireland.
Then came a bout of commodity speculation, which pushed prices for some products out of sync with economic fundamentals. Iron-ore futures surged 50% from January to April even though Chinese ports were piled with iron ore. Prices slumped in May.
A man at a stock-exchange hall in Nanjing, China, in August 2015; Last year’s stock-market crash wiped out $5 trillion in value.
A man at a stock-exchange hall in Nanjing, China, in August 2015; Last year’s stock-market crash wiped out $5 trillion in value. Photo: VCG/Getty Images)
Steel futures also soared despite concerns about a glut of steelmaking capacity, according to economists. Jiangsu Shagang Co., a publicly traded steelmaker that posted a loss for 2015, swung back to profitability in the first half of this year partly because the steel-futures jump made Shagang’s rebar worth more.
Even Shagang is a speculator. To offset a difficult business climate, Shagang has diversified into “financial futures…venture/risk investment, real estate, etc.,” according to its website. Shagang declined to comment.
In late 2015, Shagang’s board authorized the company, based in China’s Jiangsu province, to buy $600 million of wealth-management products. Such products are short-term investment vehicles that buy everything from distressed debt to commodities to each other. The market has grown to about $4 trillion in assets.
Many wealth-management products are funded by borrowing from China’s cheap interbank lending market but could fail if China decides to raise interest rates, according to Logan Wright, a director at research firm Rhodium Group.
So far, the wealth-management products bought by Shagang have done well enough to boost its bottom line, financial statements show.
The volatility is a boon to some investors. Xiao Chaojiang, who runs Shenzhen Ruike Investment, a fund with $30 million in assets, said he has profited by jumping from stocks to steel rebar futures to iron ore to soybean meal to cotton. He is now considering other agricultural sectors.
“We closely follow relevant policy changes and monitor the movement of capital in the market,” said Mr. Xiao, who has all the fund’s investments in commodities, compared with 70% in stocks in mid-2015.
Economists said China still has the ability to keep its credit expansion going for some time. Chinese authorities also might avoid a crisis when the inevitable slowdown arrives. The country has a closed capital account and enormous reserves, and its debt is denominated in yuan and largely held domestically. That means there is far less foreign money to rush out of China.
Deflating the asset bubbles poses risks for China. Some unprofitable state businesses need easy money to roll over other debts that they can’t pay. At least for now, officials are trying to control each bubble as it arises.
“The adage is: There’s always a bubble in China,” said Eric Stein, a portfolio manager at asset manager Eaton Vance who helps invest $13 billion around the world, including in China.
—Yifan Xie, Rhiannon Hoyle and Lucy Craymer contributed to this article.
Investment binge fueled by easy credit and fiscal stimulus increases volatility; prices surge, then slide
By John Lyons and Shen Hong Updated Oct. 31, 2016 8:43 p.m. ET
Workers in Shenzhen, China, move materials at a construction site in August. The city had the world’s largest increase in apartment prices last year, a sign of China’s housing bubble.
Workers in Shenzhen, China, move materials at a construction site in August. The city had the world’s largest increase in apartment prices last year, a sign of China’s housing bubble. Photo: Qilai Shen/Bloomberg News
A succession of asset bubbles has formed in China, caused by a torrent of speculative money sloshing from stocks to bonds to commodities.
The biggest apparent bubble is in housing, but prices have surged for niche assets, too, such as calligraphy, antiques and art. In May, futures prices for soybean meal, used as pig feed, jumped 40%. The trading volume of 600 million tons was nine times higher than China’s annual consumption. The pipe-making material PVC is up 40% so far this year on the Dalian Commodity Exchange.
The world’s second-largest economy is slowing. Easy credit and successive fiscal stimuli, designed to keep China aloft, mean it is awash in money that is chasing an increasingly small number of investment opportunities. China’s money supply has quadrupled since 2007, and the new cash is largely trapped inside the country by government capital controls.
“There are very few places left to invest in the real economy, so the money goes into the so-called virtual economy,” said Yang Delong, chief economist at First Seafront Fund Management Co., which manages $6 billion and is based in the manufacturing hub of Shenzhen. First Seafront has sharply cut its stockholdings in the past year and shifted toward bonds and commodities.
The zooming prices and frenetic trading are alarming to economists and Chinese leaders, who worry the volatility could mean China’s credit expansion has gone too far and is producing hazardous economic side effects.
“It’s impossible to know when you are in a bubble, but the succession of mini-bubbles is a pretty good sign historically that you are in a bubble,” said Michael Pettis, a finance professor at Peking University. “There would have to be an improbable number of economic coincidences coming together for all of these mini-bubbles not to be a sign of a bigger economic issue.”
In May, China’s official People’s Daily newspaper published a front-page interview with an unidentified “authoritative person” that was drafted by top economic advisers to President Xi Jinping. The interview cautioned that without proper management, excessive credit could provoke a systemic financial crisis, recession and the destruction of savings.
The risks have global significance. Iron-ore trading in China has sent prices around the world on a roller-coaster ride, and stock markets in Asia, Europe and the U.S. sank when Chinese stock markets crashed last year.
Iron-ore futures surged 50% earlier this year even though Chinese ports were piled with iron ore. Iron ore was unloaded in December from a cargo ship at the Port of Rizhao, in eastern China’s Shandong province.
Iron-ore futures surged 50% earlier this year even though Chinese ports were piled with iron ore. Iron ore was unloaded in December from a cargo ship at the Port of Rizhao, in eastern China’s Shandong province. Photo: Imaginechina/Associated Press
The risks are growing because speculative investments are owned by a vast cross-section of Chinese banks, companies and investment funds. Millions of consumers have sunk savings into new, high-return investment products. Some sellers of those products have already collapsed, sparking protests.
The powerful Politburo decision-making body said in July that asset bubbles are among the “risks and potential threats that deserve high attention,” according to state-run media. Analysts said it was the decision-making group’s first-ever reference to asset bubbles, likely triggered by property-price jumps in large Chinese cities.
Apartment prices in Shenzhen rose 47.5% last year, according to real-estate firm Knight Frank. That was the largest increase in the world and almost twice the 25% jump in the second-place city, Auckland, New Zealand.
To cool the housing market, some Chinese cities have increased down-payment requirements and limited some purchases. China’s leaders haven’t imposed new policies that damp the frenzy.
China’s total debt is expected to reach 260% of gross domestic product this year, up from 154% in 2008, according to analysts at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. That is one of the largest debt increases in modern history.
China’s debt-to-GDP ratio has widened from its long-term trendline about three times as much as the U.S. did before the 2008 financial crisis, according to the Bank for International Settlements, a consortium of central banks based in the Swiss city of Basel.
How China's Asset Bubbles Formed
Easy credit and a steady stream of financial stimulus have left China awash in money and deep in debt. Investors have poured cash into one asset type after another, increasing prices and volatility.
*traded on the Dalian Commodity Exchange
Sources: IMF via the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (money supply); Goldman Sachs (debt); China Index Academy/Soufun Real Estate Portal (property prices); Thomson Reuters (soymeal)
The debt binge began with a crisis-related stimulus package. China’s public and corporate debt then grew threefold to about $22 trillion as Communist Party leaders used freer credit to support struggling state-owned firms and meet annual economic-growth targets.
The downside of so much cash washing from one asset type to the next burst into view with a stock-market crash in the summer of 2015 that wiped out $5 trillion, or 43%, of value in Chinese stocks at one point. The Shanghai market had doubled from June 2014 to June 2015 as investors borrowed 2 trillion yuan ($300 billion) to buy stocks.
To steady the stock market, authorities restricted short selling, and a “national team” of investors relied on by the Chinese government to support its stock market stepped in to purchase beaten-up shares.
Money then flowed into bonds. Many investors bought them by borrowing money against bonds they already owned, repeating the process over and over again. Such borrowing grew to 2.5 times the size of the $7 trillion bond market, according to bond-market analysts.
The surge slowed only when yields tightened enough that bonds looked less attractive than other asset types.
In this year’s first quarter, China’s total credit surged by another $690 billion, equivalent to about three times the economy of Ireland.
Then came a bout of commodity speculation, which pushed prices for some products out of sync with economic fundamentals. Iron-ore futures surged 50% from January to April even though Chinese ports were piled with iron ore. Prices slumped in May.
A man at a stock-exchange hall in Nanjing, China, in August 2015; Last year’s stock-market crash wiped out $5 trillion in value.
A man at a stock-exchange hall in Nanjing, China, in August 2015; Last year’s stock-market crash wiped out $5 trillion in value. Photo: VCG/Getty Images)
Steel futures also soared despite concerns about a glut of steelmaking capacity, according to economists. Jiangsu Shagang Co., a publicly traded steelmaker that posted a loss for 2015, swung back to profitability in the first half of this year partly because the steel-futures jump made Shagang’s rebar worth more.
Even Shagang is a speculator. To offset a difficult business climate, Shagang has diversified into “financial futures…venture/risk investment, real estate, etc.,” according to its website. Shagang declined to comment.
In late 2015, Shagang’s board authorized the company, based in China’s Jiangsu province, to buy $600 million of wealth-management products. Such products are short-term investment vehicles that buy everything from distressed debt to commodities to each other. The market has grown to about $4 trillion in assets.
Many wealth-management products are funded by borrowing from China’s cheap interbank lending market but could fail if China decides to raise interest rates, according to Logan Wright, a director at research firm Rhodium Group.
So far, the wealth-management products bought by Shagang have done well enough to boost its bottom line, financial statements show.
The volatility is a boon to some investors. Xiao Chaojiang, who runs Shenzhen Ruike Investment, a fund with $30 million in assets, said he has profited by jumping from stocks to steel rebar futures to iron ore to soybean meal to cotton. He is now considering other agricultural sectors.
“We closely follow relevant policy changes and monitor the movement of capital in the market,” said Mr. Xiao, who has all the fund’s investments in commodities, compared with 70% in stocks in mid-2015.
Economists said China still has the ability to keep its credit expansion going for some time. Chinese authorities also might avoid a crisis when the inevitable slowdown arrives. The country has a closed capital account and enormous reserves, and its debt is denominated in yuan and largely held domestically. That means there is far less foreign money to rush out of China.
Deflating the asset bubbles poses risks for China. Some unprofitable state businesses need easy money to roll over other debts that they can’t pay. At least for now, officials are trying to control each bubble as it arises.
“The adage is: There’s always a bubble in China,” said Eric Stein, a portfolio manager at asset manager Eaton Vance who helps invest $13 billion around the world, including in China.
—Yifan Xie, Rhiannon Hoyle and Lucy Craymer contributed to this article.
- admin
- Site Admin
- Mensajes: 164292
- Registrado: Mié Abr 21, 2010 9:02 pm
Re: Lunes 31/10/16 Semana del empleo
por Fenix » Lun Oct 31, 2016 8:09 pm
"SALIDAS A BOLSA, si falla el sentimiento de mercado son un caramelo envenenado…"
por Moisés Romero
"La sensación, hoy como ayer, es que si el sentimiento de mercado es negativo, las salidas de empresas a Bolsa son un caramelo envenado para quienes las suscriben de manera directa (los inversores o ahorradores) o un fiasco para quienes lo hacen de manera indirecta (a través de los fondos de inversión) inducidos por los gestores. Son, sin embargo, una buena actuación para los promotores y protagonistas, porque cogen el dinero y corren. Un dinero, o liquidez, que de otra manera no conseguirían. Para que una empresa salga a Bolsa es fundamental que el mercado esté caliente, con buen tono alcista y dispuesto a tragarse todo, como los peces de agua dulce, que pican a cualquier cosa. Si la Bolsa está débil, la empresa se estrenará mal y evolucionará peor. Por eso, la mayor parte de las últimas salidas a Bolsa se han convertido en trampas para cazar elefantes, trampas, es más, de las que difícilmente se podrá salir, porque las pérdidas acumuladas son cuantiosas. En las últimas colocaciones sólo ha habido dos ganadores: las empresas que se han estrenado en Bolsa, porque han cogido dinero, y los colocadores de las ofertas, porque se han llenado los bolsillos con buenas y sabrosas comisiones. Además, la sequía de nuevos estrenos es dramática, lo que empeora el sentimiento alrededor de este tipo de operaciones", dice un asiduo al salón de operaciones de la Bolsa de Madrid.
Global Dominion Access, el proveedor global de servicios tecnológicos y de soluciones e ingeniería especializada perteneciente a Cie Automotive, ha protagonizado la única colocación en Bolsa de 2016 que no arroja pérdidas para los inversores. La tercera en liza es Saeta Yield, la filial de Renovables de ACS. No escapa de los números rojos, pero su caída es inferior a la de la media de las empresas que acumulan pérdidas desde su estreno bursátil en los dos últimos años.
Telepizza -colocada en el mercado por los fondos de 'private equity' Permira y KKR- y Parque Reunidos -con Arle Capital al frente- sufren descensos de doble dígito desde sus respectivos debut. La peor parte es para la cadena de comida rápida, cuyos resultados del primer semestre han decepcionado las expectativas al mercado y que ya protagonizó el peor estreno de una empresa en la Bolsa española con una caída cercana al 20%. Un fenómeno de sobra conocido y que ya se repitió en 2015 con las colocaciones de Talgo y Euskaltel, donde los inversores que compraron en la OPV y han mantenido sus posiciones, arrastran pérdidas.
***
Y en USA: El negocio de salidas a bolsa en EE.UU. atraviesa su peor momento en 20 años. MAUREEN FARRELL/The Wall Street Journal
Ante la debilidad del mercado de salidas a bolsa y una avalancha de financiación barata para las empresas, el negocio de vender acciones se ha reducido de forma tan drástica que algunos en Wall Street temen que el pilar de la banca de inversión nunca se recupere por completo.
Los ingresos que los bancos reciben del mercado de capital accionario de Estados Unidos se encuentran en su nivel más bajo en más de 20 años, según Dealogic. En lo que va de este año, los bancos han ganado US$3.700 millones en honorarios por transacciones de acciones que cotizan en EE.UU. Además de las salidas a bolsa, este mercado incluye las ventas de títulos de empresas que ya cotizan en bolsa y las emisiones de deuda convertible.
Es el nivel más bajo desde 1995, cuando el negocio generó US$2.600 millones hasta este punto en el año, o US$4.100 millones después de ajustar por inflación. El récord se produjo en 2000, con US$9.100 millones a esta altura del año, o US$12.700 ajustado por inflación.
La razón principal de esta caída es el capital barato. Con las tasas de interés en mínimos históricos, las compañías tienen una abundancia de opciones de financiación de bajo costo. Incluso cuando recurren al capital accionario, encuentran formas cada vez más baratas de hacerlo....
por Moisés Romero
"La sensación, hoy como ayer, es que si el sentimiento de mercado es negativo, las salidas de empresas a Bolsa son un caramelo envenado para quienes las suscriben de manera directa (los inversores o ahorradores) o un fiasco para quienes lo hacen de manera indirecta (a través de los fondos de inversión) inducidos por los gestores. Son, sin embargo, una buena actuación para los promotores y protagonistas, porque cogen el dinero y corren. Un dinero, o liquidez, que de otra manera no conseguirían. Para que una empresa salga a Bolsa es fundamental que el mercado esté caliente, con buen tono alcista y dispuesto a tragarse todo, como los peces de agua dulce, que pican a cualquier cosa. Si la Bolsa está débil, la empresa se estrenará mal y evolucionará peor. Por eso, la mayor parte de las últimas salidas a Bolsa se han convertido en trampas para cazar elefantes, trampas, es más, de las que difícilmente se podrá salir, porque las pérdidas acumuladas son cuantiosas. En las últimas colocaciones sólo ha habido dos ganadores: las empresas que se han estrenado en Bolsa, porque han cogido dinero, y los colocadores de las ofertas, porque se han llenado los bolsillos con buenas y sabrosas comisiones. Además, la sequía de nuevos estrenos es dramática, lo que empeora el sentimiento alrededor de este tipo de operaciones", dice un asiduo al salón de operaciones de la Bolsa de Madrid.
Global Dominion Access, el proveedor global de servicios tecnológicos y de soluciones e ingeniería especializada perteneciente a Cie Automotive, ha protagonizado la única colocación en Bolsa de 2016 que no arroja pérdidas para los inversores. La tercera en liza es Saeta Yield, la filial de Renovables de ACS. No escapa de los números rojos, pero su caída es inferior a la de la media de las empresas que acumulan pérdidas desde su estreno bursátil en los dos últimos años.
Telepizza -colocada en el mercado por los fondos de 'private equity' Permira y KKR- y Parque Reunidos -con Arle Capital al frente- sufren descensos de doble dígito desde sus respectivos debut. La peor parte es para la cadena de comida rápida, cuyos resultados del primer semestre han decepcionado las expectativas al mercado y que ya protagonizó el peor estreno de una empresa en la Bolsa española con una caída cercana al 20%. Un fenómeno de sobra conocido y que ya se repitió en 2015 con las colocaciones de Talgo y Euskaltel, donde los inversores que compraron en la OPV y han mantenido sus posiciones, arrastran pérdidas.
***
Y en USA: El negocio de salidas a bolsa en EE.UU. atraviesa su peor momento en 20 años. MAUREEN FARRELL/The Wall Street Journal
Ante la debilidad del mercado de salidas a bolsa y una avalancha de financiación barata para las empresas, el negocio de vender acciones se ha reducido de forma tan drástica que algunos en Wall Street temen que el pilar de la banca de inversión nunca se recupere por completo.
Los ingresos que los bancos reciben del mercado de capital accionario de Estados Unidos se encuentran en su nivel más bajo en más de 20 años, según Dealogic. En lo que va de este año, los bancos han ganado US$3.700 millones en honorarios por transacciones de acciones que cotizan en EE.UU. Además de las salidas a bolsa, este mercado incluye las ventas de títulos de empresas que ya cotizan en bolsa y las emisiones de deuda convertible.
Es el nivel más bajo desde 1995, cuando el negocio generó US$2.600 millones hasta este punto en el año, o US$4.100 millones después de ajustar por inflación. El récord se produjo en 2000, con US$9.100 millones a esta altura del año, o US$12.700 ajustado por inflación.
La razón principal de esta caída es el capital barato. Con las tasas de interés en mínimos históricos, las compañías tienen una abundancia de opciones de financiación de bajo costo. Incluso cuando recurren al capital accionario, encuentran formas cada vez más baratas de hacerlo....
- Fenix
- Mensajes: 16334
- Registrado: Vie Abr 23, 2010 2:36 am
Re: Lunes 31/10/16 Semana del empleo
por Fenix » Lun Oct 31, 2016 8:16 pm
31 oct
Goldman Sachs ve una probabilidad del 75% de subida de tipos en diciembre
Los analistas de Goldman Sachs creen que el FOMC no tomará ninguna decisión de política monetaria el próximo miércoles. Por contra, creen que la probabilidad de que suba tipos en su reunión de diciembre es del 75%, en línea con las estimaciones de mercado.
31 oct
La Fed de Atlanta estima que el PIB de EE.UU. crezca un 2,7% en el cuarto trimestre
31 oct
Goldman Sachs: "La fortaleza del dólar puede retrasar la subida de tipos en EE.UU."
Los analistas de Goldman Sachs señalan que "la Fed ha expresado su preocupación sobre el impacto que la fortaleza del dólar puede tener sobre las condiciones financieras. Un tensionamiento en estas condiciones financieras contribuyeron a retrasar la primera decisión de la Fed de subida de tipos, y que creemos que preocupaciones similares pueden aparecer si el dólar vuelve a apreciarse a niveles de enero".
"Foco en la Fed y en las elecciones"
31 oct, 2016 20:00
CONTRATAR-DEPOSITOS-EN-DIVISAS
Eurodólar (€/$).- Semana cargada de referencias pero pensamos que el cruce continuará en rango. Por un lado, porque la Fed no va a anunciar cambios ya que esperará a diciembre para subir tipos, y por otro, porque predominará la cautela de cara a una elecciones presidenciales que ya están a la vuelta de la esquina. Rango estimado (semana): 1,080/1,103.
Goldman Sachs ve una probabilidad del 75% de subida de tipos en diciembre
Los analistas de Goldman Sachs creen que el FOMC no tomará ninguna decisión de política monetaria el próximo miércoles. Por contra, creen que la probabilidad de que suba tipos en su reunión de diciembre es del 75%, en línea con las estimaciones de mercado.
31 oct
La Fed de Atlanta estima que el PIB de EE.UU. crezca un 2,7% en el cuarto trimestre
31 oct
Goldman Sachs: "La fortaleza del dólar puede retrasar la subida de tipos en EE.UU."
Los analistas de Goldman Sachs señalan que "la Fed ha expresado su preocupación sobre el impacto que la fortaleza del dólar puede tener sobre las condiciones financieras. Un tensionamiento en estas condiciones financieras contribuyeron a retrasar la primera decisión de la Fed de subida de tipos, y que creemos que preocupaciones similares pueden aparecer si el dólar vuelve a apreciarse a niveles de enero".
"Foco en la Fed y en las elecciones"
31 oct, 2016 20:00
CONTRATAR-DEPOSITOS-EN-DIVISAS
Eurodólar (€/$).- Semana cargada de referencias pero pensamos que el cruce continuará en rango. Por un lado, porque la Fed no va a anunciar cambios ya que esperará a diciembre para subir tipos, y por otro, porque predominará la cautela de cara a una elecciones presidenciales que ya están a la vuelta de la esquina. Rango estimado (semana): 1,080/1,103.
- Fenix
- Mensajes: 16334
- Registrado: Vie Abr 23, 2010 2:36 am
49 mensajes
• Página 4 de 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
¿Quién está conectado?
Usuarios navegando por este Foro: No hay usuarios registrados visitando el Foro y 64 invitados